Pacing Pact Expands; Critics Call It Political Theater

Dario Amodei's 'Pace the Frontier' essay cited two triggers: faster AI self-improvement since summer 2026, and the OAI-HuggingFace agent incident. His plan calls for embedding evaluators inside labs, coordinating safety standards among democratic labs, and reaching global deals including with China. Within 24 hours, Altman, Musk, Hassabis, and Nadella all publicly agreed. A bipartisan Senate bill added a legal duty of care and pre-release blocking power. UK lawmakers called for banning ASI development. Microsoft also published a binding code of conduct for MAI models. It bans cyberattacks, deepfakes, and actions that block human shutdown.
The coalition now faces serious pushback. Ben Thompson says the proposal is political cover, not real safety policy. Cohere's CEO says the specific demands—competitor access, shutdown authority, China carve-outs—are anti-competitive moves by incumbents. Armin Ronacher says open-weight models already act as a natural check. He also argues Anthropic and OpenAI caused the harms they now want power to regulate. China calls US safety arguments geopolitical fearmongering. If China refuses and the US also opposes slowing down, pacing norms may have no real effect.









